2009/03/14

The Significant turnaround of markets on time cycle date of March 13th has materialised


The Sensex and Nifty rallied 5% to end the week on a extremely positive note.This is the biggest rise in 3 months.Hopes for a recovery in the battered US banking system boosted investor confidence across the world.All our thursdays counters which had given buy signals like Reliance Industries,ICICI,Tata Motors,Infosys were all up with good volumes.Nifty and Sensex both have given a fresh buy signal.The downtrend which began on Febraury 16th when i got a sell signal has ended.The trend at the moment is up.We had a time cycle date of March 13th which was assumed to be a bottom ,has indeed turned out to be a bottom,the significant turnaround i mentioned in earlier blog has materialised.We are in a new uptrend.Banking Index has also generated a new buy signal,with the leader SBI giving a fresh buy signal.Immidiate target for nifty is 2755 and 2805.Fresh buy signals have been generated in many counters.Email for details.

2009/03/13

Real Estate: Ridiculously Overpriced piece of Earth


Let us not forget that Deepak Parekh-the man, synonymous with lending for Real Estate has been the biggest proponent of a fall in prices for the past two years. Now that his belief has come true, the biggest losers would be Real Estate financiers like HDFC, HDFC Bank, ICICI, Axis and the motley scores of PSU Banks run by people who would be classified as no more than clueless Babus in the private sector.
My premise is simple, if you finance let us say 70 per cent of a new development and the value of collateral falls by 50 per cent, you suddenly have an asset that no longer covers the Bank's internally mandated margins.
This fall, as so dramatically portrayed by today's Economic Times, will mean call for a marging top-up, a repayment of a loan, foreclosure or even a default. Have all those Banks who funded Real Estate in the past 4 years planned for the possibility that Prime Real Estate could fall 40 to 50 per cent in value? If not, then do they have a Plan B? If not, why do we still continue to hang onto Real Estate stocks, when most of these concerns are likely to go down-under just like the massive and illusory land banks they created.
Some two weeks ago, Mumbai-based stock broker Ashok Samani won an auction to buy eight apartments owned by the late Harshad Mehta in the posh Worli locality. Mr Samani, who put in a winning bid of Rs 32.60 crore, or Rs 26,080 per sq ft, for the apartments in the upmarket housing society, Madhuli, is pleased with the bargain.

“I feel it’s a reasonable price. Compared to prices a year ago, it’s a decent buy,” he says. Apartments in buildings of Madhuli’s class were selling for Rs 38,000-40,000 per sq ft around the same time last year, about a third higher than the rate at which Mr Samani struck his deal.

Mr Samani may be satisfied with his bargain, but a number of other potential buyers don’t seem to think that the time is ripe yet for the best deals. In early 2008, a Rs 18-crore deal was negotiated for a 2,925 sq ft house in Delhi’s upscale Defence Colony area by a builder who planned to demolish the house sitting on the land and develop apartments, hoping for a return of about 30%.

But after the downturn in the real estate market, he is trying hard to wriggle out of the deal, even at the cost of losing the Rs 50 lakh he had paid as ‘token money’ indicating his intention to purchase the property. “A few buyers have approached me with a price of Rs 9-10 crore, but exited mid-way,” said a broker who is negotiating on behalf of the property’s owner.

As in the rest of the world, the real estate market in India is trapped in a vicious cycle of plunging prices. With the bottom nowhere in sight, potential buyers do not want to try and catch a falling knife, says Pranay Vakil, chairman, Knight Frank India, a property consultancy firm. “They are expecting a further cut in prices, while developers themselves have been dropping prices, anticipating an increase in sales volumes.”

Rajneesh Chhabra, a property broker based in south Delhi, says asking rates are down 30% from their peak, but it’s still almost impossible to find a buyer. “Financiers have disappeared from the market and those dependent on bank loans do not buy property in south Delhi,” he says, adding that deal volumes have shrunk by more than 95% from their peaks about a year ago.

With the financial year drawing to a close this month, cash-strapped real estate developers have already cut prices by an average 40% in all their upcoming projects.

“I expect prices will soon come back to the 2003-04 levels, when rates were hovering between Rs 12,000 and Rs 17,000 in upmarket areas like Malabar Hill,” says Mumbai Estate Agents Association president Yashwant Dalal.
In Malabar Hill, the most expensive home address in India, prices have fallen by a fourth to Rs 25,000-45,000 per sq ft, depending on the age of the building and amenities.

Ten months ago, actor Vinod Khanna offered to pay Rs 1.25 lakh per sq ft for a 2,500 sq ft apartment in the ultra-luxury El Plazo housing society in the Hanging Gardens area of Malabar Hill. “Now the rates are in that area (Hanging Gardens) are around Rs 70,000 to Rs 75,000 per sq ft. Similarly, in Pedder Road, rates are around Rs 45,000 per sq ft,” Mr Dalal says.

A London-based Indian national acquired a 3,475 sq ft property at NCPA Apartments in the Nariman Point area at Rs 97,842 per sq ft nearly six months ago, but rates there are almost half that now, says a south Mumbai property dealer.

In central Mumbai’s Worli and Lower Parel areas, rates are down to Rs 12,000-18,000 per sq ft, while in Bandra they have fallen by more than a fifth to Rs 15,000-25,000. Where price drops have been of the order of 50%, buyers appear to be showing interest.

“We are quoting Rs 16,000 per sq ft for our new project in Lower Parel and the initial response has been positive,” says Orbit Corporation finance director Ram Yadav. A year ago, property prices in this area were over Rs 35,000 per sq ft.

Properties in the heart of the national capital on Prithviraj Road, Aurangzeb Road, Amrita Shergill Marg, Jor Bagh and Golf Links, which have seen deals involving industrialists such as LN Mittal, Naveen Jindal and GM Rao as well as film star Shah Rukh Khan, are now struggling to find buyers. A 11,250 sq ft home in Golf Links, which was purchased for Rs 70 crore, is now available for Rs 50 crore, but there are few takers.

“Earlier, financiers used to buy homes. Now, they neither have money nor the hope that they will be able to sell it at a higher rate and so have just withdrawn from the market. End-users are rare and they only negotiate, but don’t buy in the expectation that prices will fall further,” says Neeraj Chopra, a Dwarka-based property broker.

In India’s technology capital Bangalore, prices have fallen by up to 25% in some areas, a recent Morgan Stanley report says. DLF, India’s biggest real estate company, cut rates by about 30% at its upcoming project and the company sees prices falling further. Irshad Ahmed, president of Irshads Property Matters, says that in suburbs such as Whitefield, Outer Ring Road and Sarjapur Road hard bargaining can result in final prices, which are 30% lower than card rates.

Property dealers and builders are also lining up an array of discounts and freebies to try and clinch deals.

The Gateway project by developer Brigade in Malleshwaram, one of the oldest localities in town, is quoting at Rs 5,090 per sq ft against Rs 5,790 per sq ft last year. But there is scope for negotiations, depending on which flat is chosen and the mode of payment, says an official of the marketing team. Second-sale rates at Gateway are Rs 4,700-4,800 per sq ft, according to a property dealer.

In Bangalore’s downtown area, the Mantri group’s upmarket Altius complex, which has only one apartment to a floor with a current market price of around Rs 14 crore, there aren’t many units available for a second sale. A city broker says that since there are no other projects that open up to views of the city’s lung space, Cubbon Park, the price will hold. But the number of people showing interest in buying has dropped, he adds.

However, in the upmarket areas of Chennai there have been no considerable price drops. In Chennai’s Arcot Road, Purasawakkam, Thiruvanmiyur and Valasaravakkam areas, rates still hover between Rs 4,700 and Rs 6,600, about the same a year ago, a dealer says, but prices have fallen by 20-30% in the suburbs.

In Kolkata, prices have fallen from their peaks touched in mid-2008 and hover around levels seen at the beginning of the year. In areas such as Ballygunge Circular Road, Sunny Park and Queens Park rates, which were Rs 8,500-10,000 per sq ft in January 2008 jumped to Rs 13,000-14,000 in June-July before dropping to Rs 9,000-11,000.

“Prices in the city’s posh areas, including Ballygunge Circular Road and Queens Park, had surged because of limited supply, but they have been hit now. Areas like Prince Anwar Shah Road, Behala and Lake Town remain unaffected, as real estate prices in these areas never reached unrealistic levels,” says Jitendra Khaitan, CEO of real estate consultancy Pioneer Property Management.

Sumit Dabriwala, managing director of property developer Hiland Group, says high-end residential properties, which were being sold at Rs 12,000-15,000 per sq ft last year, are averaging Rs 9,000-10,000 per sq ft now. “On an average, properties in upmarket areas have seen a 10-15 % price reduction in the premium category,” he says.

A few banks have cut home loan rates in recent weeks, sparking hope that sales will pick up in the quarter beginning April, rescuing the property market from its downward spiral. This could be a crucial period, as the impact of the ongoing financial crunch is expected to peak by then.

2009/03/12

Satyam target reached


On March 6th Satyam was showing bullish signals which was indicated in the blog on that day.The targets given were 44.75,47.85 and 50.90.Today Satyam made a high of 52.90.If it manages to close above 51, it is headed for 60.90.Since the counter was news based it was told to trade with caution.There are rumours that IBM could bag Satyam.Other prominent bidders in the race are L&T and B.K Modi owned Spice Group.

Anil Ambani : Biggest loser on the 2009 Forbes World Billionaire list


Indian businessman Anil Ambani has been revealed as the biggest loser on the 2009 Forbes World Billionaire list, losing $31.9bn over the past 12 months.

Mr Ambani, who runs the telecoms and finance arms of the former Reliance Group, had been 2008's biggest gainer.

India's billionaires saw massive falls, with Mr Ambani's brother Mukesh and steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal both seeing over half their net worth wiped out.

The 793 people listed lost 23% of total wealth on average over the past year.

The impact of the global economic downturn on people's fortunes was apparent, with 332 names from last year's list not making the cut.

Anil Ambani's losses saw him drop to number 34 on the list, from number six last year.

Mukesh Ambani, who heads Reliance Industries, saw his fortune shrink from $43bn last year to $19.5bn.

However, despite slipping two places to number seven on the list, he overtook Lakshmi Mittal, boss of steelmaker Arcelor Mittal, as India's richest man.

Mr Mittal's wealth has plummeted from $45bn to $19.3bn, according to Forbes. He fell from number four to number eight on the list.

Mkts up after we missed the global rally party due to holidays


Markets witnessed buying interest since we had missed on the international market rally due to holidays.All sectoral indexes were in green.There was buying interest in Reliance Inds,ICICI,ITC,Infosys, and HUL.However Bharti,NTPC, and DLF lost ground.Nifty closed at 2602,still in neutral zone.Many counters have given buy signals in todays trade like Reliance Inds,Infosys,Tata Motors and ICICI Bank.If there is follow up buying in the coming days we could witness some more uptrend.Nifty has to close above 2645 for uptrend to sustain.

2009/03/11

US markets gain 5.8%,biggest point gain since Nov 2008


Dow Jones Rallied 5.8% on Tuesday to close at 6926 a rise of 379 points.This is the biggest gain since November 2008.Asian markets were also trading higher on the back of US markets with Japans Nikkie up 4.6%.Analysts though were cautious on the durablity of the upmove,the follow up buying if it comes will take away the fears.Dow has given a buy signal in yesterdays close,which has to be further confirmed by giving a close above 6951.Then we could see a relief rally in the coming days,which also coincides with our time cycle date of March 13th on Friday which is assumed to be a bottom.I am expecting one significant turn around, probably up in between the two time cycle dates of March 13th and March 26th.A decisive rise above 7100 in dow would confirm that the down leg started in Jan 2009 has ended and we could see a 15-20% upmove in this rally.

2009/03/10

When stock prices drop, where's the money?


Have you ever wondered what happened to your socks when you put them into the dryer and then never saw them again? It's an unexplained mystery that may never have an answer. Many people feel the same way when they suddenly find that their brokerage account balance has taken a nosedive. So, where did that money go? Fortunately, money that is gained or lost on a stock doesn't just disappear. Read to find out what happens to it and what causes it.

Disappearing money
Before we get to how money disappears, it is important to understand that regardless of whether the market is in bull (appreciating) or bear (depreciating) mode, supply and demand drive the price of stocks, and fluctuations in stock prices determine whether you make money or lose it.

So, if you purchase a stock for $10 and then sell it for only $5, you will (obviously) lose $5. It may feel like that money must go to someone else, but that isn't exactly true. It doesn't go to the person who buys the stock from you. The company that issued the stock doesn't get it either. The brokerage is also left empty-handed, as you only paid it to make the transaction on your behalf. So the question remains: where did the money go?

Implicit and explicit value
The most straightforward answer to this question is that it actually disappeared into thin air, along with the decrease in demand for the stock, or, more specifically, the decrease in investors' favorable perception of it.

But this capacity of money to dissolve into the unknown demonstrates the complex and somewhat contradictory nature of money. Yes, money is a teaser - at once intangible, flirting with our dreams and fantasies, and concrete, the thing with which we obtain our daily bread. More precisely, this duplicity of money represents the two parts that make up a stock's market value: the implicit and explicit value.

On the one hand, money can be created or dissolved with the change in a stock's implicit value, which is determined by the personal perceptions and research of investors and analysts. For example, a pharmaceutical company with the rights to the patent for the cure for cancer may have a much higher implicit value than that of a corner store.

Depending on investors' perceptions and expectations for the stock, implicit value is based on revenues and earnings forecasts. If the implicit value undergoes a change - which, really, is generated by abstract things like faith and emotion - the stock price follows.

A decrease in implicit value, for instance, leaves the owners of the stock with a loss because their asset is now worth less than its original price. Again, no one else necessarily received the money; it has been lost to investors' perceptions.

Now that we've covered the somewhat "unreal" characteristic of money, we cannot ignore how money also represents explicit value, which is the concrete worth of a company. Referred to as the accounting value (or sometimes book value), the explicit value is calculated by adding up all assets and subtracting liabilities. So, this represents the amount of money that would be left over if a company were to sell all of its assets at fair market value and then pay off all of liabilities.

But you see, without explicit value, implicit value would not exist: investors' interpretation of how well a company will make use of its explicit value is the force behind implicit value.

Disappearing trick revealed
For instance, in February 2009, Cisco Systems Inc had 5.81 billion shares outstanding, which means that if the value of the shares dropped by $1, it would be the equivalent to losing more than $5.81 billion in (implicit) value. Because CSCO has many billions of dollars in concrete assets, we know that the change occurs not in explicit value, so the idea of money disappearing into thin air ironically becomes much more tangible.

In essence, what's happening is that investors, analysts and market professionals are declaring that their projections for the company have narrowed. Investors are therefore not willing to pay as much for the stock as they were before.

So, faith and expectations can translate into cold hard cash, but only because of something very real: the capacity of a company to create something, whether it is a product people can use or a service people need. The better a company is at creating something, the higher the company's earnings will be and the more faith investors will have in the company.

In a bull market, there is an overall positive perception of the market's ability to keep producing and creating. Because this perception would not exist were it not for some evidence that something is being or will be created, everyone in a bull market can be making money. Of course, the exact opposite can happen in a bear market.

To sum it all up, you can think of the stock market as a huge vehicle for wealth creation and destruction.

Disappearing socks
No one really knows why socks go into the dryer and never come out, but next time you're wondering where that stock price came from or went to, at least you can chalk it up to market perception.

Buffett sticks to his view that shares are best long-term investment


Warren Buffet ,the US investor dubbed the Sage of Omaha, continues to be a cheerleader for equities despite recent spectacular misjudgments on the timing of his buy and hold philosophy.

In a wide ranging interview with the CNBC television todayhe insisted that over 10 years, "you will do considerably better owning a group of equities" than US treasury bonds. This echoed his comments to the New York Times in Oct­ober that he was buying US equities. Since then the Dow Jones industrial average has fallen by over 26% and more than 2,300 points as it tests lows which have not been seen for 12 years.

Yesterday Buffett defended his October assessment of the market. "I stand by the article," he said. "I just wish I had written it a few months later." He claimed he was not calling the bottom of the market in October and yesterday again refused to be drawn on the short term outlook for financial markets.

"I would never have a feeling that the Dow is going to go to 2,000 or 12,000 or 4,300 or 20,200. I don't – I know over time it will go higher," Buffett said. "But if you buy a cross section of good equities, generally well capitalised companies, you'll make money over 10 or 20 years. I haven't the faintest idea where you'll be in 10 months, but it really doesn't make any difference."

His comments come just over a week after Buffett had to tell investors in his Berkshire Hathaway investment group that 2008 had been the worst year since he took the helm 44 years ago. He reported then that the group's annual income had fallen by 59% and that $11.5bn (£8bn) had been wiped off its net worth.

In that annual letter to shareholders, he predicted that the economy would be a shambles throughout 2009 and yesterday he said: " It's fallen off a cliff, and not only has the economy slowed down a lot, people have really changed their behaviour like nothing I've ever seen."

He described the current crisis as "an economic Pearl Harbor", performing close to his worst case scenario, and he believed that in September last year the financial system came perilously close to a complete breakdown.

Although Buffett anticipates further economic pain, with unemployment rising and inflation returning, he is confident that the US economy will recover.

" Everything will be all right. We do have the greatest economic machine that man has ever created, I believe," Buffett said. "This machine is gummed up right now and it's gummed up by a lack of confidence, and that makes people scared and, I mean, it feeds back and forth and it's a vicious cycle."

Buffett urged American political leaders to act to counter that fear.

"I've never seen the consumer or the Americans just generally more fearful than this. And they're also confused. And you can get fearful very quickly, but you don't get confident, you know, in five minutes. You can get fearful in five minutes, but you won't get confident for some time.

"And government is going to play an enormous factor in how fast it comes back. And if you're confused and fearful, you don't get over being fearful till you aren't confused. I mean, the message has to be very, very clear as to what government will be doing.

"And I think we've had – and it's the nature of the political process, somewhat, but we've had muddled messages, and the American public does not know … they feel that they don't know what's going on and their reaction, then, is to absolutely pull back."

MARKETS CLOSE LOWER


Markets opened with a downward gap on Monday 9th March.Weak global cues continue to haunt us.The relief rally of friday was shortlived.Relentless FII selling brought down the bankex by 24% in last 15 days.There was selling pressure through out the day,nifty opened at 2600 ,20 points lower and then went down below 2560 levels to close at 2573.We have two holidays on Tuesday and wednesday when international markets are open.So Thursdays opening will depend on how international markets react in these two days.A close below 2564 will make markets even weak.The bullish levels are bit far off so trend continues to be down to neutral.We have 2 time cycle dates this month, one is on March 13th and another March 26th.This also happens to be a fibonacci window where major market turn arounds can happen.Looking at the present market dynamics i would assume that we would bottom somewhere around these dates.From where markets could see a good bounce.As of now there no signals of bottom yet.

2009/03/09

LIC hikes stakes in many companies

As indices have been falling recently, slowly LIC has bought some stocks; mainly they are banks which have faced most of the selling pressure.

Companies where LIC has raised stakes recently (Source: Various news reports)

Stock

Stake hiked to (%)

ICICI Bank

9.38

GAIL

9.98

IOB

7.09

HDFC Bank

7.105

PNB

10

As an investor, you should not get tired of buying. Peter Lynch once said, "When stocks are attractive, you buy them. Sure, they can go lower. I've bought stocks at $12 that went to $2, but then they later went to $30. You just don't know when you can find the bottom."

Bear market is the best time to build a portfolio. Those who miss out on such opportunities, have to beg for corrections so that they can get a chance to buy, but they hardly get any offerings. The time is not too far for the rally. Better to be a beneficiary of a bull-run than a beggar of a bull-run.

Crude Oil may touch $75 as China hedges US Treasury risk

After falling from $147 to $35 per barrel towards the end of last year, crude oil has once again gained and touched $45 per barrel on increased speculation that China’s stimulus plan may spur demand for the commodity near term. However, some experts are of the view that this is not just speculation but real purchases driving the prices up.

China is said to be considering buying crude oil as part of its strategy to diversify holdings from US Treasuries. This is to hedge against the risk of US Treasury prices dropping and dollar depreciation in the long run, with the Obama government issuing government bonds worth dollar trillions to finance economic stimulus measures.

The Asian giant, which has been building a national oil stockpile since 2004, is planning to stock 100 million barrels by next year, Japanese business daily Nikkei reported last week.

China has about $2 trillion in foreign reserves, the largest in the world. It put Japan behind as the No 1 holder of US Treasuries last September. Two-thirds of China's foreign reserve assets are said to be dollar denominated, according to the business daily.

Suresh Chandra, analyst at Horizon Capital Management, says, “the next bubble to burst will be the US treasuries. Over the past 15 months, the Arab oil countries have been the biggest buyers of US treasury bills worth $245 billion. The next biggest buyer is China at $233 billion.”

“However, the current economic situation has changed the game of the business. With the slump in the global economy and US running huge fiscal deficit, the dollar is expected to depreciate heavily in the mid- to long-term. And hence, a country like China, which has huge foreign reserves in dollars and US treasuries, is trying to hedge against their dollar denominated holdings,” he added.

Although the scale of the potential oil purchases by China is unknown, buying 100 million barrels would amount to $4 billion at current market prices--representing only 0.2% of China's foreign reserves.

Jonathan Paul, principle economist at Krug and Bordman Commodity Advisory, said, “Crude oil should rise to at least $75 per barrel in 2009. One way is OPEC may raise prices and other one is a huge demand on cards from developing and other countries-- those wanting to shy away from the dollar denominated assets.”

“The major difference between gold and oil as a hedge against dollar, is that one can consume oil in various development activities but it is not the case with gold. Hence, I expect crude oil price to rise in mid-to-long term and it may be in the $65-75 range in near term,” Paul added.

SENSEX YEAR ON YEAR RETURNS

Sensex Year on Year

YEAR
First Traded Day
of January
Last Traded Day
of December
% Chg
1991
999.26
1908.85
91.03
1992
1957.33
2615.37
33.62
1993
2539.67
3346.06
31.75
1994
3465.86
3926.90
13.30
1995
3932.09
3110.49
-20.89
1996
3127.94
3085.20
-1.37
1997
3260.56
3658.98
12.22
1998
3694.62
3055.41
-17.30
1999
3060.34
5005.82
63.57
2000
5375.11
3972.12
-26.10
2001
3955.08
3262.33
-17.52
2002
3246.15
3377.28
4.04
2003
3390.12
5838.96
72.23
2004
5915.47
6602.69
11.62
2005
6679.20
9397.93
40.70
2006
9390.14
13708.34
45.99
2007
13942.24
20286.99
45.51
2008
20300.71
9647.31
-52.48